juliabohemian:

jebbifurzz:

Was Thor: Ragnarok considered a “good” movie for the same reasons Venom was considered a “bad” movie?

I’ve been thinking a lot about this. Thor and Eddie are like equal opposites. Both white male protagonists that can fight with super strength, but they differ in every other way, especially in how they treat others (in that specific film).

Eddie treats others with respect and compassion, he listens, he does not expect any sort of automatic deference from others. He bonds with a weird slime alien, and that love is what wins the day.

In Thor: Ragnarok, Thor is the complete opposite. He is callous and cruel, refuses to listen and instead insists that his perception is the correct one, and becomes angry when others do not immediately tie themselves to him and his goals. Thor beats his own brother into submission rather than trying to understand or listen to him. When Thor is not strong enough to destroy the “bad guy”, he destroys his entire realm to kill the “bad guy”. The day is won by an obscene amount of destruction.

Thor: Ragnarok was met with high praise from the critics. Venom was dubbed a terrible movie. Are these markedly different receptions indicative of what personality mainstream audiences want to see in their male heroes?

Sensitivity and compassion are not traits associated with western masculinity. In fact, they are often interpreted as a weakness. So, it makes sense that western audiences would perceive Thor’s callousness and general disregard for the feelings of others as a strength. 

People want to watch movies that reinforce their existing views. When those views are challenged, they react negatively. Which explains the unfavorable reviews for Venom. The subconscious expectation was that Eddie would overcome Venom through brute force. The actual outcome left people confuzzled.

odin’s wonderful parenting

worstlokisuggestion:

theloneycanadian:

worstlokisuggestion:

child 1: raise them to have homicidal, violent tendencies then lock them up in a prison because lol u got nothing on me till i’m dead good luck finding me then 

child 2: ego/power complex raise him to also want war and have an unnecessary attachment to his hammer but haha those were just the training wheels you didn’t need that thing

child 3: lmao ur adopted and I got you to use you to prevent the wars the other 2 kids will cause also ur worthless and will never be good enough what do you mean ur suicidal

A paragon of parenting

truly 

miskiett:

edge-of-silvermoon:

cosmicjoke:

juliabohemian:

mcufam:

Odin pitting his sons against one another from an early age.

As a parent, I find this scene particularly disturbing. They both know Thor is older and that Thor will be king. Why even tell Loki that he was born to be a king? What is the point of that?

You know what else is important to notice about this scene, and which only further exposes the stupidity and purposeful ignorance of Taika Waititi regarding the Thor films, is that in this scene, if you compare the expressions on Thor’s face and Loki’s face, in Thor you see an extremely confident, even arrogant young boy, totally sure of himself and his place, and in Loki you see a young boy not at all sure of himself, looking up at Odin with an almost pleading, longing expression, as if seeking reassurance.  It’s plain as day from this one scene alone which of the two brothers experienced from an early age popularity and confidence and security, and which felt like the outcast, unsure and even insecure.  Yet TW was going to have a scene in Ragnarok which showed Thor as the bullied child and Loki as the mean bully.  What an idiot.  

That’s too charitable tbh. I think he’s not an idiot, it’s a deliberate choice on his part to make Loki look as bad as possible, and he thinks reversing the brothers’ role in childhood is the way to achieve that.

TR reversed many things about their characters to try to siphon the audiences interest off of Loki and paste it onto Thor. It didn’t work for the people who pay attention. This coming from someone who really liked and had high hopes for Thor.

At the end of the day, Thor needs to gain emotional-intelligence and individuality in order to grow and become really interesting. He just doesn’t ever get that. So he remains shallow as hell and I remain frustrated and disappointed. Loki got sabotaged for nothing.

foundlingmother:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

ohanadoesntapplytoadam:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

ohanadoesntapplytoadam:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

jlaws:

You must be Hela.

Thor: Ragnarok (2017) dir. Taika Waititi

Those last two gifs tho

Odin didn’t choose Thor to be king because Thor was Asgardian and Loki was secretly a Frost Giant

Odin chose Thor to be king because he didn’t see a lot of himself in Thor

And saw waaaaaaay too much of himself in Loki

Like

There’s a reason why the first thing Hela says to these two is the same thing Loki says when he tries to conquer earth

Odin was an asshole to the nine realms out of a belief that Asgardians were better and even when he stopped his warmongering he still thought Asgard was more important than the other realms

And Loki learned the Worst Possible Lessons from him. Not as bad as Hela given that Loki at least turned away from the whole “Being an heir to the throne of Asgard gives me the right to Do What I Want” thing in this film and Infinity War but still

Do you ever think Loki purposefully learnt all this to try and impress Odin? Like he just wants his Dad to love him so he creates himself in his Dad’s image thinking that’s what Odin wants.

Absolutely!

And his resentment of Thor is down to the fact that he can’t understand why Odin prefers this guy whose just a big weird puppy dog who wants to have adventures and fight evil because Loki doesn’t know about Odin’s messed up past any more than Thor does

It also makes Odin’s anger at Thor in the first movie take on a whole new meaning as well…he’s not just pissed at Thor because his actions were foolish and headstrong he’s pissed because Thor did exactly what he used to do, invaded another world and caused trouble because he was sure what he was doing was right and they were wrong

When Odin calls Thor “Vain” with such venom in his voice in that film he’s not just pissed at Thor he’s remembering all the shit he did as well and dreading the thought of it all happening all over again if he doesn’t do something to teach Thor a bit of humility

It makes the second movie that much better as well because what the Dark Elves did wasn’t that far off from what Odin did, but then you can see that he still has a trace of the Asgardian Superiority complex with how he treats Jane.

INDEED

And yeah I kind of wonder if maybe Asgard didn’t start the issues with the Dark Elves we saw come to fruition in this film now that we know what we know

First, Thor in Thor isn’t “…just a big weird puppy dog who wants to have adventures and fight evil….” Thor in Thor flips a table because his “day of triumph” was ruined. The first scene we see with Thor is him, not Loki, stating he will be king and fantasizing about destroying an entire race. We are not meant to believe that Thor’s behavior in Thor is a sudden upset following his failed coronation. We’re meant to perceive that Thor’s always been bold, entitled, reckless, and warmongering (and racist), though there’s a glimpse of a good heart–of the hero he will become–beneath that.

Second, Loki does attempt to emulate Odin and Thor’s behaviors, believing they will earn him the recognition and love he craves. For instance, he attacks Jotunheim in such a way that he would accomplish Thor’s goal (destroying the race), which Odin never condemned, without bringing full on war to Asgard, which Odin did condemn. Loki does resent that Odin favors Thor. However, due to the above truths about Thor’s character pre-Thor, its not for the reasons describe in this post. Loki’s positioned as the level-headed, diplomatic brother, who’s a bit mischievous/manipulative on the side. Odin, unless he’s fucking monumentally stupid, should be much more concerned about pre-Thor Thor’s personality, rather than pre-Thor Loki’s. Pre-Thor Thor’s way more similar to Hela-era Odin.

Third, no. No. Odin does not favor Thor because he’s not like Odin. He doesn’t look at Thor and think, “Asgard needs a better king than I, and Thor’s that king.” No. He never tells Thor anything, he yells at Thor whenever Thor questions him, he forces Thor to act the way he expects Thor to, he calls Thor’s love interest a goat (not strictly relevant, but I figured I’d remind people he’s racist af), and he sends guards authorized to use whatever force necessary to prevent Thor from doing something about the conflict with the Dark Elves (after shutting down Thor’s attempts to rationally discuss the problem). None of this suggests he values Thor’s ideas, or principles, etc. where they differ from Odin’s own. I’m sorry, I just don’t buy that Odin knows Thor will be a better king for Asgard, yet refuses to treat Thor like an equal or hear Thor’s input at any point in the films. Odin refuses to confront his own faults, to the point that he dooms Asgard rather than admit that he fucked up in the past. He covers over the history and keeps the spoils of war. No, Odin doesn’t realize he’s wrong or bad. He doesn’t fear seeing himself in his children. He fears seeing individuals. He fears not being able to control his children. That’s why Hela had to go. That’s why Loki had to go. He couldn’t control them.

I feel like now would be a good time to remind everyone that in the junior novelization of Thor (2011), Odin openly expresses doubt BEFORE the coronation about Thor’s readiness to take on the responsibility of his title. And Frigga’s words of reassurance to him come in the form of reminding Odin that Thor will have Loki to help him.

One might ask themselves, if Odin and Frigga trust Loki’s judgment so much more than they do Thor’s–as this scene would appear to suggest–why not simply make Loki king instead? Perhaps it has something to do with the order of inheritance, Thor being their firstborn and all. But if it did, Odin was needlessly cruel in setting up this “only one of you can be king” game we see with young Thor and young Loki at the beginning of the film. What other circumstances might give Odin pause at the idea of naming Loki his heir? 🤔 Truly, a mystery for the ages. I feel blue just thinking about it.

Whoa whoa whoa whoa, hold up just a damn minute, you little punk. What exactly is the big difference between what you did on Jötunheim and what Loki did on Midgard? ‘Cause I’m pretty sure it’s not the body count.

Next time someone says Thor learned his lesson and changed his ways, I want them to come justify this BS to me.

Source: Thor The Dark World junior novelization